Google's Privacy Labels Are (Surprise) BAD - Surveillance Report 34 - Techlore
video description
Maybe you could -smuggle- code onto a system that way, but you'd still have to get the user to download and execute some other piece of code that then extracts the embedded malware and runs it. Which antiviruses might then catch. So not sure about the real world implications of that one.
Date: 2022-04-15
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 8
Common
My thought, as someone under 35 who doesn-t read privacy policies, is that despite what a PP may say, I-m probably going to be tracked, catalogued and analysed anyway. I do my best to obfuscate the information before the company/whoever takes it. It may not be as good as flat out not using a certain service, but I guess that speaks to the privacy/security convenience discussion we all know about.
reply
My thought, as someone under 35 who doesn-t read privacy policies, is that despite what a PP may say, I-m probably going to be tracked, catalogued and analysed anyway. I do my best to obfuscate the information before the company/whoever takes it. It may not be as good as flat out not using a certain service, but I guess that speaks to the privacy/security convenience discussion we all know about.
reply
Nicegy019
9: 09 -Online Dating is risky- First, let's stop pretending Tinder is a -dating app- when everyone knows it's a hookup app. That's like saying OnlyFans is exactly like Patreon. Second, giving people the power to run background checks is something that could easily be abused for things like identity theft, stalking, and harassment.
reply
9: 09 -Online Dating is risky- First, let's stop pretending Tinder is a -dating app- when everyone knows it's a hookup app. That's like saying OnlyFans is exactly like Patreon. Second, giving people the power to run background checks is something that could easily be abused for things like identity theft, stalking, and harassment.
reply
storm
Google's new 2-step security -system- is a big headache, and a big-brother move: they need to be absolutely certain it's really me using Google right now, and not some interloper, hooligan or impersonator. Next they'll insist on knowing that my cell phone's GPS-tracking feature has been fully activated.
reply
Google's new 2-step security -system- is a big headache, and a big-brother move: they need to be absolutely certain it's really me using Google right now, and not some interloper, hooligan or impersonator. Next they'll insist on knowing that my cell phone's GPS-tracking feature has been fully activated.
reply
MANOWAR
I understand you have a label. But allowed to block nothing. Same like app tracking they said just tracking not to block the tracking. Android has labeled for dinosaur area and still can block some. In apple you not can block nothing on a Wi-Fi an Apple products crying for Wi-Fi every morning
reply
I understand you have a label. But allowed to block nothing. Same like app tracking they said just tracking not to block the tracking. Android has labeled for dinosaur area and still can block some. In apple you not can block nothing on a Wi-Fi an Apple products crying for Wi-Fi every morning
reply
Electric
I-m by no means defending Google, but Chrome on iOS runs on the safari engine so I-d imagine they-d have no reason to even update it as often as their Android counterpart. However, knowing Google, you-re probably spot-on regardless about them waiting for it to -blow over-
reply
I-m by no means defending Google, but Chrome on iOS runs on the safari engine so I-d imagine they-d have no reason to even update it as often as their Android counterpart. However, knowing Google, you-re probably spot-on regardless about them waiting for it to -blow over-
reply
jdm
People that watch mainstream news need to start watching these. This is real news that the people need to know about. Keep rocking. Solid content, team. -
reply
People that watch mainstream news need to start watching these. This is real news that the people need to know about. Keep rocking. Solid content, team. -
reply
Finn
Assuming the bluetooth virus was truly benign, there could be some mission creep but it's also a bold statement about how sketchy bluetooth is.
reply
Assuming the bluetooth virus was truly benign, there could be some mission creep but it's also a bold statement about how sketchy bluetooth is.
reply
Justin
I call BS on whoever is claiming North Korea is behind the malware.
If it's a government it's almost assuredly US or Israel.
reply
I call BS on whoever is claiming North Korea is behind the malware.
If it's a government it's almost assuredly US or Israel.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
