VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Crash Course
Induction - An Introduction: Crash Course Physics #34

Induction - An Introduction: Crash Course Physics #34

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
This episode was sponsored by Prudential. Go to and see how quickly 1% can add up ShroomZed: These videos have to be among the most ineffectual ways you could possibly teach someone. Information is thrown at you in blocks of non-sequiturs and equations.
No context or reasoning is given for the conclusions shown, you-re just expected to accept the shiny equations on the screen one after the other, and a good number of things here are stated in such a odd, simplified way that it borders on complete misinformation.
I understood everything stated here, but that-s because I-ve been through university physics and I winced multiple times throughout this video as things are explained in such a cavalier way.
Crash Course should stick to talking about the Napoleonic Wars or something because they clearly don-t have the skills to talk meaningfully about subjects such as this.

Date: 2022-04-04

Comments and reviews: 7


This is an excellent opening. I get some knowledge about the topic which makes me want to read more in depth about then. After reading in depth, I can come back to this and rewatch it, and understand it much better. I love how there's no Time wastage. Hate off to y'all
reply

I know all about this from my physics teacher at school, except Lenz-s law. And I was suddenly aware of how fast she was going through all of this. I could not understand the rule, nor the experiments conducted to conclude it.
reply

Thank you so much, there are a lot people complaining in the comments but I am honestly so grateful that u do videos like these, as they are so much more engaging and I get a lot more out of them than my textbooks
reply

At 6: 32 the current is backwards. I think it was backwards earlier, too. I really like these animations and explanations, I wish PBS would fix the errors.
reply

examples starting at 6: 06 are incorrect. This was pointed out by a few people, but otherwise good video. Perhaps a remake is in order?
reply

this is aimed for high schoolers, and here I am as a physics major trying to understand the basics before diving head first into pURCELL
reply

So you put the doohikie between the doobaledo and you get some thingamajigees? -I hope I spelled those -Words- correctly-
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos