The Creation of Chemistry - The Fundamental Laws: Crash Course Chemistry #3
video description
Date: 2022-04-04
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 8
chris
it sounds like hank believes that economic disparity was key to the scientific achievements that took place. but consider this, if one genius with most of the money could accomplish so much by being able to afford equipment and perform experiments, how much could have been accomplished if all the people had access to that equipment and could all work together and collaborate? Don't you think there might have been some geniuses in France that just never got the chance to do anything due to that wealth disparity? He said to think about the implications and I did
reply
it sounds like hank believes that economic disparity was key to the scientific achievements that took place. but consider this, if one genius with most of the money could accomplish so much by being able to afford equipment and perform experiments, how much could have been accomplished if all the people had access to that equipment and could all work together and collaborate? Don't you think there might have been some geniuses in France that just never got the chance to do anything due to that wealth disparity? He said to think about the implications and I did
reply
Stijn
In my dialect of dutch, -West-Flemish-, Lussac is exactly pronounced the same way as our cuss word, lussak, which is a shortening of -luie- (lazy) and zak -nutsac-. Precedented by the word Gay, made me -laughter-when writing it down. The next name I had to write down was, Lorenzo Romano Amedeo Carlo Avogadro di Quaregna e Cerreto. I had the feeling the universe was punishing my small-mindedness.
reply
In my dialect of dutch, -West-Flemish-, Lussac is exactly pronounced the same way as our cuss word, lussak, which is a shortening of -luie- (lazy) and zak -nutsac-. Precedented by the word Gay, made me -laughter-when writing it down. The next name I had to write down was, Lorenzo Romano Amedeo Carlo Avogadro di Quaregna e Cerreto. I had the feeling the universe was punishing my small-mindedness.
reply
Peaches
I think it would be fair to say that french inequality allowed him to achieve his work, but you make it sound like there's no other feasible alternative. Yes, some means will result in an end, but they're not to automatically be accepted as the only option and they certainly are not to be excused. Im alright with taking both the good and bad of history.
reply
I think it would be fair to say that french inequality allowed him to achieve his work, but you make it sound like there's no other feasible alternative. Yes, some means will result in an end, but they're not to automatically be accepted as the only option and they certainly are not to be excused. Im alright with taking both the good and bad of history.
reply
DanteDarcangelo
The implications of wealth inequality have always been the same. The fortunate thrive at the suffering of the unfortunate. And eventually the suffering unfortunate outnumber and suffer to such an extent that the fortunate start misplacing their heads. I'll leave you to think of the implications of that on your own.
reply
The implications of wealth inequality have always been the same. The fortunate thrive at the suffering of the unfortunate. And eventually the suffering unfortunate outnumber and suffer to such an extent that the fortunate start misplacing their heads. I'll leave you to think of the implications of that on your own.
reply
cleverick
I'd like to see Lavoisier's personal fortune pay for CERN or NASA. Science doesn't need aristocrats and inequality to make it happen, and if it was reliably funded more consistently we might be a lot further on than we are thanks to some curious billionaires.
reply
I'd like to see Lavoisier's personal fortune pay for CERN or NASA. Science doesn't need aristocrats and inequality to make it happen, and if it was reliably funded more consistently we might be a lot further on than we are thanks to some curious billionaires.
reply
Jared
Shouldn't it be 1 O to 1. 75 N, 1 O to 0. 875 N, and 1 O to. 4375 N. If you multiply everything by 16 (oxygen atomic mass) you get the correct values of 16 O to 28 N (N2O, 16 O to 14 N (NO, and 16 O to 7 N (NO2)
reply
Shouldn't it be 1 O to 1. 75 N, 1 O to 0. 875 N, and 1 O to. 4375 N. If you multiply everything by 16 (oxygen atomic mass) you get the correct values of 16 O to 28 N (N2O, 16 O to 14 N (NO, and 16 O to 7 N (NO2)
reply
Ali
I would have don-t this episode and episode 2 as parts 1 & 2 and then gone on to the structure later. I feel it-s jumping around a bit.
reply
I would have don-t this episode and episode 2 as parts 1 & 2 and then gone on to the structure later. I feel it-s jumping around a bit.
reply
Mark
I understand that you are trying to simplify, but Joseph Priestley gave Lavoisier a great starting point for many of his discoveries.
reply
I understand that you are trying to simplify, but Joseph Priestley gave Lavoisier a great starting point for many of his discoveries.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
