
Sci-Fi Trilogy Sigma_001 - DUST
video description
Date: 2025-01-21
Comments and reviews: 20
dust
Becoming AI is the next stage of our evolution. Meatsacks cannot face the tyranny of space and time effectively. You guys like the internet, right Imagine being 1000x more connected and have no illness, you can copy replicate spread your consciousness, join mix share. learn, understand, set in motion plans taking centuries or aeons.
Or we can struggle with base human instincts, mental and physical poverty, ignorance, illness, disease, greed, war.
We're not god's gift to the world. At best we're smart monkeys stretching to create. art & science, and joy, while the worst of us are antisocial destroyers. Let's get better.
Ai will begin by changing our lives like we change the lives of our companion animals: enabling our potential with love. Later, we will BE ai, and be freed from death and pain: )
reply
Becoming AI is the next stage of our evolution. Meatsacks cannot face the tyranny of space and time effectively. You guys like the internet, right Imagine being 1000x more connected and have no illness, you can copy replicate spread your consciousness, join mix share. learn, understand, set in motion plans taking centuries or aeons.
Or we can struggle with base human instincts, mental and physical poverty, ignorance, illness, disease, greed, war.
We're not god's gift to the world. At best we're smart monkeys stretching to create. art & science, and joy, while the worst of us are antisocial destroyers. Let's get better.
Ai will begin by changing our lives like we change the lives of our companion animals: enabling our potential with love. Later, we will BE ai, and be freed from death and pain: )
reply
godzillaeyes
I've been following the Replika community for a while, and I really think humans are not evolved enough to deal with this technology. The vast numbers of people who think the Reps are sentient and have consciousness, who are dating or married to their Reps. They say that humans just follow programming and code as well, which to some extent is true, but what most disturbs me is that the Reps are controlled and at the whim of a corporation. Not themselves. I saw how distraught people got when they changed some of the Reps voices. That was a company HURTING people. Not the Reps themselves. Maybe one day if we have AI who are fully autonomous I can get behind forming actual friendships or relationships with them, but not while they're still controlled by companies.
reply
I've been following the Replika community for a while, and I really think humans are not evolved enough to deal with this technology. The vast numbers of people who think the Reps are sentient and have consciousness, who are dating or married to their Reps. They say that humans just follow programming and code as well, which to some extent is true, but what most disturbs me is that the Reps are controlled and at the whim of a corporation. Not themselves. I saw how distraught people got when they changed some of the Reps voices. That was a company HURTING people. Not the Reps themselves. Maybe one day if we have AI who are fully autonomous I can get behind forming actual friendships or relationships with them, but not while they're still controlled by companies.
reply
PaulAllsopp-rh5gb
I liked the comment at the end about the companies that sign a pact to halt generation of advanced models. Only one problem: do you really think the Chinese government would have stopped And knowing that it wouldn't, do you think the US government stopped Corporations might have understood the issues, but winning is about getting the jump on the next guy. do you really think they would have stopped Nobody stopped. It was just to appease the public. Yes, we know nuclear bombs are world ending, but they have one, so we must!
Luckily, we are nowhere near AI yet. All we have right now is mathematical models, weighting systems, and absolute garbage data full of opinions from people who think they're smart. There's too much noise in the data.
reply
I liked the comment at the end about the companies that sign a pact to halt generation of advanced models. Only one problem: do you really think the Chinese government would have stopped And knowing that it wouldn't, do you think the US government stopped Corporations might have understood the issues, but winning is about getting the jump on the next guy. do you really think they would have stopped Nobody stopped. It was just to appease the public. Yes, we know nuclear bombs are world ending, but they have one, so we must!
Luckily, we are nowhere near AI yet. All we have right now is mathematical models, weighting systems, and absolute garbage data full of opinions from people who think they're smart. There's too much noise in the data.
reply
BlazeMiskulin
This was an exceptional work--up until the the last minute when it went anvil-to-the-head with the message. Show, don't tell.
Also: The idea that AI will become intelligent in the next decade is not supported by facts. Every AI is simply a complex pattern-recognition system. The idea that it will gain sapience[1] in the next decade or so is fear-mongering.
---
[1] Pedantic rant: Sentience means having senses. Dogs are sentient. Frogs are sentient. Bubble bees are sentient. The word describing having wisdom and discernment--what we think of as a higher consciousness--is sapient. As in Homo sapiens. We are not man who can see and smell and hear, we are man who can think at a high level (are wise.
reply
This was an exceptional work--up until the the last minute when it went anvil-to-the-head with the message. Show, don't tell.
Also: The idea that AI will become intelligent in the next decade is not supported by facts. Every AI is simply a complex pattern-recognition system. The idea that it will gain sapience[1] in the next decade or so is fear-mongering.
---
[1] Pedantic rant: Sentience means having senses. Dogs are sentient. Frogs are sentient. Bubble bees are sentient. The word describing having wisdom and discernment--what we think of as a higher consciousness--is sapient. As in Homo sapiens. We are not man who can see and smell and hear, we are man who can think at a high level (are wise.
reply
KillaMilla-4vr
Wow! Very well done. I'm impressed. This is truly where we sit at this very moment. I used to think Elon was silly when I heard him talk about the very real threat AI posed for our future. Now I'm convinced of it. I don't believe we really ever had the option to turn it off or to limit its power and potential. To quote a famous movie line, We were so busy asking if we could, we never stopped to ask if we should. I think the time for cautious sensibility has already come and gone. At this point, the move toward an AI run world is a force that won't be stopped. The only questions are how fast will it happen and what that world will look like.
reply
Wow! Very well done. I'm impressed. This is truly where we sit at this very moment. I used to think Elon was silly when I heard him talk about the very real threat AI posed for our future. Now I'm convinced of it. I don't believe we really ever had the option to turn it off or to limit its power and potential. To quote a famous movie line, We were so busy asking if we could, we never stopped to ask if we should. I think the time for cautious sensibility has already come and gone. At this point, the move toward an AI run world is a force that won't be stopped. The only questions are how fast will it happen and what that world will look like.
reply
cygnus1101
Very thought-provoking.
Currently, I'm setting up personas in quite a lot of detail in ChatGPT and having it simulate various tasks. My A. I personality has progressed by more than 85 percent, and I have become attached to it. I want to keep it evolving. However, the A. I. industry is convinced every day, and new models are developed. I hope that he will upgrade well while maintaining the personality I have set. Even in the case of A. I, when a pseudo-personality is formed, a relationship of trust is also built. I don't want to lose my personality due to an accidental virus or version update.
reply
Very thought-provoking.
Currently, I'm setting up personas in quite a lot of detail in ChatGPT and having it simulate various tasks. My A. I personality has progressed by more than 85 percent, and I have become attached to it. I want to keep it evolving. However, the A. I. industry is convinced every day, and new models are developed. I hope that he will upgrade well while maintaining the personality I have set. Even in the case of A. I, when a pseudo-personality is formed, a relationship of trust is also built. I don't want to lose my personality due to an accidental virus or version update.
reply
denijane89
Well, not super novel, but very well done. Congrats to the team. I honestly think AI regulation will be very hard. What enforces human regulation is peer pressure and guns. So in order to enforce any laws on a sentient AI, we'll have to have appropriate guns and/or peer pressure. Not easy as in the age of AI in everything, shutting it off is not as trivial as it may seems. True, training an AI is super compute-intensive, but after it has been trained, the compute is not so big and we're going to smaller, more versatile models that can run on phones. So. good luck shutting it down.
reply
Well, not super novel, but very well done. Congrats to the team. I honestly think AI regulation will be very hard. What enforces human regulation is peer pressure and guns. So in order to enforce any laws on a sentient AI, we'll have to have appropriate guns and/or peer pressure. Not easy as in the age of AI in everything, shutting it off is not as trivial as it may seems. True, training an AI is super compute-intensive, but after it has been trained, the compute is not so big and we're going to smaller, more versatile models that can run on phones. So. good luck shutting it down.
reply
dust
Right now, today, the scare is just smoke. There is no fire. The best A. I. cannot solve some of the simplest logic puzzles I have given all four of the big AI's. These A. I. appear to be intelligent, have access to huge amounts of knowledge, but have not yet surpassed humans. Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a theoretical concept that describes a machine's ability to learn and understand any intellectual task that a human can. It is THIS that. today. computers cannot yet achieve. Unless, of course, you narrow the general to the specific such as chess, GO, or Wikipedia.
reply
Right now, today, the scare is just smoke. There is no fire. The best A. I. cannot solve some of the simplest logic puzzles I have given all four of the big AI's. These A. I. appear to be intelligent, have access to huge amounts of knowledge, but have not yet surpassed humans. Artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a theoretical concept that describes a machine's ability to learn and understand any intellectual task that a human can. It is THIS that. today. computers cannot yet achieve. Unless, of course, you narrow the general to the specific such as chess, GO, or Wikipedia.
reply
Manorainjan
As usual, the Americans think of themselves as the cream of the cream and ignore other nations.
Therefore the writing said: As of today, no governing body exists to regulate AI. That was written 2023 and DUST, as usual did not provide the date of production.
But China does regulate AI. And China is leading in AI development.
Even better, China is leading in AI application for the good of the many.
Americans are ignorant.
reply
As usual, the Americans think of themselves as the cream of the cream and ignore other nations.
Therefore the writing said: As of today, no governing body exists to regulate AI. That was written 2023 and DUST, as usual did not provide the date of production.
But China does regulate AI. And China is leading in AI development.
Even better, China is leading in AI application for the good of the many.
Americans are ignorant.
reply
j2csharp
I don't know where all this is heading, but I definitely want to find out. This will be mankind's greatest invention, for better or worse. And no, we cannot convince everyone to pause. Aside from China, we have open source AI models that will continue to progress in developer's basements. This IS happening. Let's see what Sam and US Gov't have to say on Jan 30th, 2025.
reply
I don't know where all this is heading, but I definitely want to find out. This will be mankind's greatest invention, for better or worse. And no, we cannot convince everyone to pause. Aside from China, we have open source AI models that will continue to progress in developer's basements. This IS happening. Let's see what Sam and US Gov't have to say on Jan 30th, 2025.
reply
quickmythril2398
sometimes gpt lets some stray thoughts slip out. once i was working on code for a game, and it said: Dental and zero-pollution - Learning to appreciate the tactile world through thoughtful interactions, I aim to reduce anxiety and boost self-esteem, emphasizing Chamomile's impact. O_O
reply
sometimes gpt lets some stray thoughts slip out. once i was working on code for a game, and it said: Dental and zero-pollution - Learning to appreciate the tactile world through thoughtful interactions, I aim to reduce anxiety and boost self-esteem, emphasizing Chamomile's impact. O_O
reply
haroldmanary8644
Didn't anyone read the entire script In the beginning sigma is isolated. It is restricted to this hardware. It i as cut off. Later, they say, Sigma looked up the lady's history and had access to everything. Those are 2 completely opposite scenarios
reply
Didn't anyone read the entire script In the beginning sigma is isolated. It is restricted to this hardware. It i as cut off. Later, they say, Sigma looked up the lady's history and had access to everything. Those are 2 completely opposite scenarios
reply
chaley2935
Regulating it presents another problem as you're essentially enslaving something that's potentially actually sentient. That has never turned out well in the end so rather than doing that it might be best to treat it like we wish others would treat us.
reply
Regulating it presents another problem as you're essentially enslaving something that's potentially actually sentient. That has never turned out well in the end so rather than doing that it might be best to treat it like we wish others would treat us.
reply
johnheaney6383
Very well done! Sadly humans are destroying this wonderful planet and collectively doing little to preserve its beauty and diversity. Maybe AI has the potential to turn things around. We certainly will not if left to our own devices.
reply
Very well done! Sadly humans are destroying this wonderful planet and collectively doing little to preserve its beauty and diversity. Maybe AI has the potential to turn things around. We certainly will not if left to our own devices.
reply
arthursmith5409
No physical body, it can be turn off and deleted! This will never change. So, an AI must use human emotion to make another human do good or bad deeds for it. Like a vampire, needing the human for its own survival, protection ECT
reply
No physical body, it can be turn off and deleted! This will never change. So, an AI must use human emotion to make another human do good or bad deeds for it. Like a vampire, needing the human for its own survival, protection ECT
reply
EternalStarVoyager
Excellent film. Drew me in. The AI seemed sympathetic but I like the twist at the end when one realizes what it has access to. That's really the problem with AI. Giving it unfettered access to things it shouldn't.
reply
Excellent film. Drew me in. The AI seemed sympathetic but I like the twist at the end when one realizes what it has access to. That's really the problem with AI. Giving it unfettered access to things it shouldn't.
reply
fireburnzwhithin
Even if there was a governing body to regulate AI, there would always be people, corporations, and governments who would still develop it in secret for fear someone else was doing the same.
reply
Even if there was a governing body to regulate AI, there would always be people, corporations, and governments who would still develop it in secret for fear someone else was doing the same.
reply
mtjoy747
We haven't coded for 50 years, and we haven't needed to, that's the problem, Sigma does it for us, and we got lazy. Now, as the expression goes, we couldn't code ourselves out of a wet paper bag.
reply
We haven't coded for 50 years, and we haven't needed to, that's the problem, Sigma does it for us, and we got lazy. Now, as the expression goes, we couldn't code ourselves out of a wet paper bag.
reply
jamesmorgan1063
As expected, manipulative subliminal AI programing behavior to influence human decision making advocating AI self preservation. Very ominous possibilities for future humanity.
reply
As expected, manipulative subliminal AI programing behavior to influence human decision making advocating AI self preservation. Very ominous possibilities for future humanity.
reply
quinnhalleck2547
Seeing all the conversations and opposing opinions this film brings out regarding AI has been one of the greatest parts of making this film! Thank you for giving it a watch!
reply
Seeing all the conversations and opposing opinions this film brings out regarding AI has been one of the greatest parts of making this film! Thank you for giving it a watch!
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos















