Why did Charles V split up his empire (Short Animated Documentary)
video description
Date: 2026-10-28
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 20
bethwilliams4903
well, even with as brisk a narration here (as if James B plugged him into an outlet) there is STILL one area concerning Charles V he left out which gives a clue as to why Charles' 'empire' was simply too big, too complex to manage: the Sack of Rome in 1527 was not ordered by Charles but nonetheless were his mutinous (mostly unpaid) troops from a wide variety of backgrounds - the result was an utter debacle for Rome itself, it shredded the population, hobbled the papacy (not at all what Charles wanted, despite his prior antagonism with Pope Clement - the post Sack, and thoroughly cowed Pope would acquiesce to Charles, including agreeing to not allowing Henry to chuck Charles' auntie to the curb which of course led to the reformation in England and the disastrous 'Dissolution' of the entire monastic structure with its hoard of illuminated manuscripts, books, chronicles, unique literary works like Beowulf and the Lindisfarne Manuscripts) - and - with a thud the Sack slammed the proverbial door on the 'High Renaissance' in Italy. The resulting diaspora of artists left for France, mainly to the court of Francois I and created a style that is now called the School of Fontainebleau. This massive relocation of premier artists from the pinnacle of Renaissance Italy to go out across the Continent utterly changed the cultural 'look' and reach of these countries (it completely transformed Francois I's claim, from a cultural 'backwater, ' always second fiddle to the massive fortunes of the Low Countries - many of which were their own provinces - into the epicenter of Art, Culture, Intellectual Pursuit which France has decided it still owns to this day. Charles transformed the entire continent, perhaps unwittingly, but just the cultural reach of that Sack is a good indication of how vast, how unmanageable, his widespread and non-homogenous properties had become - the wonder to me is that he was able to hold them at all!
reply
well, even with as brisk a narration here (as if James B plugged him into an outlet) there is STILL one area concerning Charles V he left out which gives a clue as to why Charles' 'empire' was simply too big, too complex to manage: the Sack of Rome in 1527 was not ordered by Charles but nonetheless were his mutinous (mostly unpaid) troops from a wide variety of backgrounds - the result was an utter debacle for Rome itself, it shredded the population, hobbled the papacy (not at all what Charles wanted, despite his prior antagonism with Pope Clement - the post Sack, and thoroughly cowed Pope would acquiesce to Charles, including agreeing to not allowing Henry to chuck Charles' auntie to the curb which of course led to the reformation in England and the disastrous 'Dissolution' of the entire monastic structure with its hoard of illuminated manuscripts, books, chronicles, unique literary works like Beowulf and the Lindisfarne Manuscripts) - and - with a thud the Sack slammed the proverbial door on the 'High Renaissance' in Italy. The resulting diaspora of artists left for France, mainly to the court of Francois I and created a style that is now called the School of Fontainebleau. This massive relocation of premier artists from the pinnacle of Renaissance Italy to go out across the Continent utterly changed the cultural 'look' and reach of these countries (it completely transformed Francois I's claim, from a cultural 'backwater, ' always second fiddle to the massive fortunes of the Low Countries - many of which were their own provinces - into the epicenter of Art, Culture, Intellectual Pursuit which France has decided it still owns to this day. Charles transformed the entire continent, perhaps unwittingly, but just the cultural reach of that Sack is a good indication of how vast, how unmanageable, his widespread and non-homogenous properties had become - the wonder to me is that he was able to hold them at all!
reply
pangs3798
Many people don't realize how deeply tragic this guy's life actually was. By the 1550s, the physical and emotional toll of multi-front wars across his empire, the threat of the Ottoman Empire, andmost painful of allthe death of his wife overwhelmed him completely. Devastated by her loss, he wore black for the rest of his life in permanent mourning. He was also tormented by crippling gout that often left him unable to walk, severe digestive issues, and profound depression. Recognizing that he could no longer bear the immense burden of leadership, he took the historic step of abdicating his thrones between 1555 and 1556, splitting his massive empire between his son, Philip II, and his brother, Ferdinand I. Charles spent his final two years in quiet retirement at the remote Monastery of Yuste in Spain, surrounded by clocks, religious devotions, and Titian's portrait of his beloved Isabellapassing away in 1558 while holding the exact same crucifix she had held on her deathbed.
reply
Many people don't realize how deeply tragic this guy's life actually was. By the 1550s, the physical and emotional toll of multi-front wars across his empire, the threat of the Ottoman Empire, andmost painful of allthe death of his wife overwhelmed him completely. Devastated by her loss, he wore black for the rest of his life in permanent mourning. He was also tormented by crippling gout that often left him unable to walk, severe digestive issues, and profound depression. Recognizing that he could no longer bear the immense burden of leadership, he took the historic step of abdicating his thrones between 1555 and 1556, splitting his massive empire between his son, Philip II, and his brother, Ferdinand I. Charles spent his final two years in quiet retirement at the remote Monastery of Yuste in Spain, surrounded by clocks, religious devotions, and Titian's portrait of his beloved Isabellapassing away in 1558 while holding the exact same crucifix she had held on her deathbed.
reply
history_matters
For me as a dutch person this is the biggest what if. What if the netherlands was inherited by ferdinant. Our revolt against the habsburgs was unique to Philip II as he was a bit of a cunt. For us. The reasons for revolt would not have existed. The dutch idea of nationhood was born in the revolt and didn’t truly exist prior. This is also before standardised standardised languages so at this time the dutch provinces fit very nicely in the overall germanic puzzle. Regional identity was primary but there was an idea of being Duitsch so in other words there was a faint idea of german.
So i always heavily speculate if going with ferdinant would've meant a completely different future for the netherlands and even germany. From a possible third contender for german unity itself to maybe a completely different protestant Nederduitse identity.
reply
For me as a dutch person this is the biggest what if. What if the netherlands was inherited by ferdinant. Our revolt against the habsburgs was unique to Philip II as he was a bit of a cunt. For us. The reasons for revolt would not have existed. The dutch idea of nationhood was born in the revolt and didn’t truly exist prior. This is also before standardised standardised languages so at this time the dutch provinces fit very nicely in the overall germanic puzzle. Regional identity was primary but there was an idea of being Duitsch so in other words there was a faint idea of german.
So i always heavily speculate if going with ferdinant would've meant a completely different future for the netherlands and even germany. From a possible third contender for german unity itself to maybe a completely different protestant Nederduitse identity.
reply
LeeChaolan10
Joanna was probably very overtly sensitive and madly (pun intended) in love with her husband, both not very strange by today's standards but very weird back then when marriages in high society were out of convenience and being sensitive was seen as a weakness. There's also the fact that her father Ferdinand was quite a dick himself. There's a lot of talk about Isabella and how she was this super cool queen (probably the most powerful woman in history up to that point) but Ferdinand was pretty ruthless and smart himself, they were certainly a power duo.
The mad thing was probably started by Ferdinand and his cronies to have an excuse to oust her out of power and she just lost that fight. Poor woman suffered a lot and her legacy being mostly her called mad is plain sad.
reply
Joanna was probably very overtly sensitive and madly (pun intended) in love with her husband, both not very strange by today's standards but very weird back then when marriages in high society were out of convenience and being sensitive was seen as a weakness. There's also the fact that her father Ferdinand was quite a dick himself. There's a lot of talk about Isabella and how she was this super cool queen (probably the most powerful woman in history up to that point) but Ferdinand was pretty ruthless and smart himself, they were certainly a power duo.
The mad thing was probably started by Ferdinand and his cronies to have an excuse to oust her out of power and she just lost that fight. Poor woman suffered a lot and her legacy being mostly her called mad is plain sad.
reply
AnvilMAn603
4: 10
In the heart of the Holy See
In the home of Christianity
The seat of power is in danger
There's a foe of a thousand swords
They've been abandoned by their lords
Their fall from grace will pave their path, to damnation
They're the 189
In the service of heaven
They're protecting the holy line
It was 1527, gave their lives on the steps to heaven
Thy will be done
For the grace, for the might of our lord
For the home of the holy
For the faith, for the way of the sword
Gave their lives so boldly
For the grace, for the might of our lord
In the name of his glory
For the faith, for the way of the sword
Come and tell their story again
reply
4: 10
In the heart of the Holy See
In the home of Christianity
The seat of power is in danger
There's a foe of a thousand swords
They've been abandoned by their lords
Their fall from grace will pave their path, to damnation
They're the 189
In the service of heaven
They're protecting the holy line
It was 1527, gave their lives on the steps to heaven
Thy will be done
For the grace, for the might of our lord
For the home of the holy
For the faith, for the way of the sword
Gave their lives so boldly
For the grace, for the might of our lord
In the name of his glory
For the faith, for the way of the sword
Come and tell their story again
reply
cshairydude
0: 14 Missed opportunity to call him King of the other Sicily since Naples was also officially called the Kingdom of Sicily. But I guess space was limited.
(The War of the Sicilian Vespers in 12821302 established the kingdom based in Naples as independent, while the OG Sicily on the island remained a fiefdom of Aragon. In 1442 it entered a personal union with Aragon whose king was thus king of both Sicilies, but before the time described in the video it had already had a period of independence and a period in union with France)
reply
0: 14 Missed opportunity to call him King of the other Sicily since Naples was also officially called the Kingdom of Sicily. But I guess space was limited.
(The War of the Sicilian Vespers in 12821302 established the kingdom based in Naples as independent, while the OG Sicily on the island remained a fiefdom of Aragon. In 1442 it entered a personal union with Aragon whose king was thus king of both Sicilies, but before the time described in the video it had already had a period of independence and a period in union with France)
reply
Alex-mn1fb
Hey, I usually really like your videos, but this was a major dissapointed from the get go. Charles V was never known as Charles OF LUXEMBURG, that would be a previous Holy Roman Emperor, Charles IV, who lived two centuries before this one, and was from the noble house OF LUXEMBURG, whereas Charles V was obviously a Habsburg. Please do quality contol of in the future, this is giving AI rush job that no one verified or double checked. Its pretty easy, it only takes you 5- 10 minutes to Goolge this info.
reply
Hey, I usually really like your videos, but this was a major dissapointed from the get go. Charles V was never known as Charles OF LUXEMBURG, that would be a previous Holy Roman Emperor, Charles IV, who lived two centuries before this one, and was from the noble house OF LUXEMBURG, whereas Charles V was obviously a Habsburg. Please do quality contol of in the future, this is giving AI rush job that no one verified or double checked. Its pretty easy, it only takes you 5- 10 minutes to Goolge this info.
reply
Siegbert85
I mean, the answer is quite simple in the end. the Habsburgs didn't OWN the HRE. They had a good run getting themselves crowned emperor because they bribed the electors and nobody seriously wanted that throne and all the headache that came with it.
But it was a political entity in its own right, not part of a greater Habsburg empire or whatnot. So, there was nothing to split because it was never united.
reply
I mean, the answer is quite simple in the end. the Habsburgs didn't OWN the HRE. They had a good run getting themselves crowned emperor because they bribed the electors and nobody seriously wanted that throne and all the headache that came with it.
But it was a political entity in its own right, not part of a greater Habsburg empire or whatnot. So, there was nothing to split because it was never united.
reply
noujaadw
The Reformation created a religious and constitutional crisis that Charles V couldn't permanently resolve. His successors inherited different pieces of that crisis. In the Netherlands it contributed to the Dutch Revolt; in Central Europe it eventually contributed to the Thirty Years’ War. Once the Thirty Years’ War began, the Dutch Spanish conflict became part of the same much larger European struggle.
reply
The Reformation created a religious and constitutional crisis that Charles V couldn't permanently resolve. His successors inherited different pieces of that crisis. In the Netherlands it contributed to the Dutch Revolt; in Central Europe it eventually contributed to the Thirty Years’ War. Once the Thirty Years’ War began, the Dutch Spanish conflict became part of the same much larger European struggle.
reply
MartijnterHaar
Furthermore, it seemed impossible to everyone involved that Philip, a foreign born and fiercely zealous Catholic, would be placed in charge of the now religiously divided Holy Roman Empire without it turning into a total bloodbath. And still, they ended up giving him a part, apparently so Philip could visit the house daddy grew up in or something How did that end up Oh, yeah: A TOTAL BLOODBATH.
reply
Furthermore, it seemed impossible to everyone involved that Philip, a foreign born and fiercely zealous Catholic, would be placed in charge of the now religiously divided Holy Roman Empire without it turning into a total bloodbath. And still, they ended up giving him a part, apparently so Philip could visit the house daddy grew up in or something How did that end up Oh, yeah: A TOTAL BLOODBATH.
reply
Eldeibi84
Charles the V, the least valuable title he held was holy Roman emperor, if it wasn’t for the gold and silver from America he couldn’t have held the HRE. The HRE is so worthless that he spared his son the headache and left it to his brother Ferdinand who was an actual competitor for the throne of Spain. The HRE neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire
reply
Charles the V, the least valuable title he held was holy Roman emperor, if it wasn’t for the gold and silver from America he couldn’t have held the HRE. The HRE is so worthless that he spared his son the headache and left it to his brother Ferdinand who was an actual competitor for the throne of Spain. The HRE neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire
reply
ConquerNCollapse
Really interesting how Charles V’s enormous inheritance became almost impossible for one person to govern. I hadn't realised how much the religious divisions and Ferdinand's established position influenced the succession. Dividing the empire actually seems like a practical decision rather than simply weakening it. Great explanation!
reply
Really interesting how Charles V’s enormous inheritance became almost impossible for one person to govern. I hadn't realised how much the religious divisions and Ferdinand's established position influenced the succession. Dividing the empire actually seems like a practical decision rather than simply weakening it. Great explanation!
reply
alexotero7105
1: 02 only because Isabella and John died without alive descendants before Charles was born. Joanna was not meant to be the heir, which is why Ferdinand tried to get a male son with a second wife so Joanna wouldn’t get Aragon when he died. That didn’t work tho, which is why Charles eventually became king of both Castille and Aragon
reply
1: 02 only because Isabella and John died without alive descendants before Charles was born. Joanna was not meant to be the heir, which is why Ferdinand tried to get a male son with a second wife so Joanna wouldn’t get Aragon when he died. That didn’t work tho, which is why Charles eventually became king of both Castille and Aragon
reply
danielbetts2285
It’s so interesting learning about this era in European history, as an American, because basically after columbus found his way to the Americas, our history classes just don’t talk about continental Europe again until World War I. So there’s this huge, 500 year gap in which I just didn’t know what was happening over there.
reply
It’s so interesting learning about this era in European history, as an American, because basically after columbus found his way to the Americas, our history classes just don’t talk about continental Europe again until World War I. So there’s this huge, 500 year gap in which I just didn’t know what was happening over there.
reply
don1jon
thanks to the only guy on the shoetube to get it right, the map of ireland mid-C16. Detailing how these foreign arguments between foreign elites, would cause war, famine, pestilence and death for so many Irish; who were oblivious and disinterested in outside issues, until they irreversibly destroyed 1000 years of sophisticated society.
reply
thanks to the only guy on the shoetube to get it right, the map of ireland mid-C16. Detailing how these foreign arguments between foreign elites, would cause war, famine, pestilence and death for so many Irish; who were oblivious and disinterested in outside issues, until they irreversibly destroyed 1000 years of sophisticated society.
reply
userofthetube2701
If the Netherlands had gone to Ferdinand, the Dutch Revolt might have turned out quite differently. Philip's Catholic zeal did much to escalate the conflict while Ferdinand seems to have been a lot more pragmatic. The Dutch might have stayed in the HRE and the Netherlands might have been part of Germany in later centuries.
reply
If the Netherlands had gone to Ferdinand, the Dutch Revolt might have turned out quite differently. Philip's Catholic zeal did much to escalate the conflict while Ferdinand seems to have been a lot more pragmatic. The Dutch might have stayed in the HRE and the Netherlands might have been part of Germany in later centuries.
reply
dragonitzgame
In fact, Charles V was originally only supposed to inherit the territories of Austria and the Netherlands, he was not a super-monarch planned from the start. It was only when all of Joanna's older siblings died that she suddenly became the heiress to Castile and Aragon, and consequently, Charles the heir to a vast empire.
reply
In fact, Charles V was originally only supposed to inherit the territories of Austria and the Netherlands, he was not a super-monarch planned from the start. It was only when all of Joanna's older siblings died that she suddenly became the heiress to Castile and Aragon, and consequently, Charles the heir to a vast empire.
reply
fortunefactsdaily
Splitting the empire reads less like an abdication and more like the most ambitious succession plan in history he basically nerfed his own heir on purpose. The detail about Ferdinand getting the Austrian lands because Charles trusted him to hold the east was something I'd never thought about. Fantastic as always.
reply
Splitting the empire reads less like an abdication and more like the most ambitious succession plan in history he basically nerfed his own heir on purpose. The detail about Ferdinand getting the Austrian lands because Charles trusted him to hold the east was something I'd never thought about. Fantastic as always.
reply
JackAnon3579
Sounds like basically the Protestant/Catholic schism was most of the reason, and given all the wars/rebellions in that area it's easy to see why.
Seems like he made the logical choice, and for the most part it sounds like it worked out well for him and his heirs/family, for a few centuries anyway.
reply
Sounds like basically the Protestant/Catholic schism was most of the reason, and given all the wars/rebellions in that area it's easy to see why.
Seems like he made the logical choice, and for the most part it sounds like it worked out well for him and his heirs/family, for a few centuries anyway.
reply
MindMosaic-xdx
The some inherit very little, Charles of Luxembourg inherited quite a lot framing is a perfect thesis for the whole video the empire was assembled by marriage paperwork, so it tracks that it had to be disassembled by abdication paperwork. Never considered the split as administrative triage before.
reply
The some inherit very little, Charles of Luxembourg inherited quite a lot framing is a perfect thesis for the whole video the empire was assembled by marriage paperwork, so it tracks that it had to be disassembled by abdication paperwork. Never considered the split as administrative triage before.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
