VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Crash Course
Crash Course Scientific Thinking Preview

Crash Course Scientific Thinking Preview

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
Science is one of the best ways we have of understanding what’s going on around us. In Crash Course Scientific Thinking we’ll explore the foundational principles that underlie scientific thought. Course Description In 7 episodes, Crash Course Scientific Thinking will teach learners the foundational principles underlying scientific thought, pulling back the curtain on processes like peer review, interrogating what makes sources reliable (or not, unpacking how consensus is reached, and revealing how scientific understanding changes over time. Ultimately, learners will gain the ability to think more critically about the scientific information they encounter in their everyday lives. Series Objectives - Describe the dynamic, communal nature of science, articulating the roles of uncertainty and consensus. - Explain the role of peer review and replication in science. - Unpack the potential for bias and error in science and understand its self-correction mechanisms. - Understand the role of specialization in scientific expertise. - Interpret primary, secondary, and tertiary sources, and use lateral reading to verify claims. - Understand basic statistical language used to describe scientific findings. Sources: Support us for $5/month on Patreon to keep Crash Course free for everyone forever! Or support us directly: Join our Crash Course email list to get the latest news and highlights: Get our special Crash Course Educators newsletter: Thanks to the following patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: DexcilaDou, Martin G. Diller, Johnathan Williams, Allison Wood, EllenBryn, Katrix, Jason Terpstra, Evan Nelson, Jennifer Wiggins-Lyndall, SpaceRangerWes, Dalton Williams, Chelsea S, Thomas Sully, Matthew Fredericksen, AThirstyPhilosopher, Michael Maher, Mitch Gresko, Gina Mancuso, Roger Harms, Shruti S, Quinn Harden, Reed Spilmann, Brandon Thomas, Emily Beazley, Rie Ohta, oranjeez, UwU, Elizabeth LaBelle, Leah H, David Fanska, Andrew Woods, Katie Hoban, Kevin Knupp, Barbara Pettersen, Ken Davidian, Stephen Akuffo, Toni Miles, Steve Segreto, Kyle & Katherine Callahan, Laurel Stevens, Tanner Hedrick, Kristina D Knight, Samantha, Krystle Young, Perry Joyce, Scott Harrison, Alan Bridgeman, Breanna Bosso, Matt Curls, Liz Wdow, Jennifer Killen, Duncan W Moore IV, Sarah & Nathan Catchings, team dorsey, Bernardo Garza, Trevin Beattie, Pietro Gagliardi, John Lee, Eric Koslow, Indija-ka Siriwardena, Jason Rostoker, Siobhán, Ken Penttinen, Nathan Taylor, Barrett, Les Aker, ClareG, Rizwan Kassim, Constance Urist, Alex Hackman, Triad Terrace, Katie Dean, Jason Buster, Emily T, Stephen McCandless, Thomas, Joseph Ruf, Wai Jack Sin, Ian Dundore, Erminio Di Lodovico, Evol Hong, Tandy Ratliff, Caleb Weeks, Luke Sluder __ Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet Instagram - Facebook - Bluesky - CC Kids:
Date: 2026-01-23

Comments and reviews: 20


Excited for this! One thing I would love to see covered in an episode is the distinction between science as 1) the specific discoveries, 2) the people & institutions doing science, and 3) the scientific method itself. People often conflate these. If a dangerous chemical is discovered, or if some scientist is a jerk, people might decide that science is bad which then subconsciously includes the scientific method is bad. If the distinction were more widely recognized, they might instead decide those scientists made bad choices but keep the belief that the scientific method is good.
reply

Science = Reproducible
From what I see, one of the most important misunderstandings about science in America is that a single scientific study isn't science. That's just an experiment. Real science happens when multiple different people try to reproduce the same result. Some are trying to prove it correct while others try to prove it false. The more people who run the experiment and get the same result adds confidence to the hypothesis. So to sum it up in one word, your claim needs to be REPRODUCIBLE.

reply

There are, unfortunately, too many people in the world that think reaching the capital-T Truth is a matter of shouting louder than anyone else in the room, or coming up with witty one-liners, or that it's like a boxing match and you're supposed to 'win' over anyone that disagrees with you. These are all the positions of children, and yet some people never grow out of them.
I hope that this series helps these people on their journey to adulthood, whether they be 13 or 30 years old.

reply

I am overjoyed that Hank is back for a Crash Course Series. I have so many fond memories of watching Hank when I was in high school, he truly was a game changer in explaining complex concepts and all of this is for FREE! Hank, you and your brother and everyone that works with you to produce this wonderful educational content are gifts to humanity and bright lights in this oftentimes dark world. Thank you to the entire Crash Course team for putting these shows together
reply

Science is great
However I hope they cover publication bias, publish or perish, lack of paid reviewers, journal paywalls, fake journals and articles, AI made papers, corruption and conflicts of interests, the commodification of research, struggles to get grant funding
See Elsevier
And how we can tackle these problems

reply

In the US, when I was a kid, the scientific method was taught as just something scientists do in their jobs. Wasn't until later I realized it's actually a process/framework that should apply to thinking about everything. It really is the best tool ever devised for teasing out reality.
reply

I wish you could have started this sooner. I’m doing an MReS (Master of Research) degree in Environmental Science and my grades on giving peer review are average at best. Hopefully you can teach me more about this, as well as other stuff needed to be a scientist
reply

yes yes yes! very excited for the announcement of this course! would love to see more courses more linked to meta-cognition and critical thinking especially in this day and age! this reminded me of crash course media literacy!
reply

This is such an important series! I'm excited to watch it, but I also feel like it's something that I can show people as a Hey! When I say science this is what I mean, not whatever you're filling in the blank in your head with.
reply

Just after I've finished the Crash Course US history. I'm an undergrad in Paris and I study English literature, language and history. Those classes made me get great marks in the US history class. Thank you a lot!
reply

Looking forward to this series. I've been struggling to keep afloat among the storms of buzzwords, misinformation and click baits. So hopefully I can use this course to at least prepare myself against those things
reply

As a neuroscience student I'm really excited for this. The only thing that sucks is that I'm afraid the people who need to see this the most, are the ones who won't watch it. Let's hope that's not the case!
reply

I'm extraordinarily proud of supporting Crash Course on Patreon. Everyone who is committed to accessible education and has a dollar or two a month they can spare should join me!
reply

I cannot express in words how much I appreciate this series coming out right now.
I cannot.
But, I know that I can say thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.

reply

Oh I'm so glad. Thank you. I've been thinking so much lately it feels like my 2004 generation got a lot of this taught to us, i recognize all of the ways I still benefit today.
reply

I’ve been rebuilding myself a curriculum on Re-Learning How to Learn as a former Gifted kid and this is perfect timing. Thank you Internet Science Man, I love your work. #DFTBA
reply

Hi CrashCourse, idk if you'll see this but Extra History recently started uploading complete compilations of their various series and I think you guys should do the same.
reply

In the time where social media is filled with ai slop and misinformation infected content, scientific thinking series is litrally a heaven sent.
Thanks Hank!

reply

Oh look at you sweet child, introducing yourself like we don't know who you are entrepreneur/songwriter/science communicator/internet sensation Hank Green!
reply

I think this series is important at a time when anti-intellectualism, superstition, and outright hostility towards established facts is on the rise.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos