The Rise and Fall of the Bluepill
video description
Date: 2025-06-18
Related videos
Comments and reviews: 20
baeyensraphael3902
The humanities in university are a breeding ground for all of the woke nonsense, and I believe there is an intentional design behind it.
I had a political science class in which the teacher was talking about one of these woke concepts, which was 'neo colonialism ' or 'post colonialism' or something like that. The basic idea was that the colonial mentality that was prevalent in the 18th-19th century was still ongoing to this day through art and some media. The teacher showed us a video explaining this concept, and that's how I saw the clear intent to deceive. In the video, a clip from the second Indiana Jones film was taken out of context to supposedly support the idea of colonialist thought still existing in recent movies. The scene in the movie shows indie and the woman ( forgot her name) reacting in horror to the Indian cult leader pulling a heart out of some guy. Of course, anybody who has seen the film understands that they were simply reacting to the horror of the cult's practices, but they tried to frame it as white people being horrified by backward Indian barbarians.
They probably assume that zoomers nowadays barely know anything about Indiana Jones, and assumed that the clip was a genuine argument.
The teacher also gave an example about rambo movies in which we see the main character; a white man, mowing down Vietnamese people effortlessly. That time I actually mentioned to the teacher that the first film set him against the national guard in the US, to which she had no answer to. It felt great to have an opportunity to counter such lies.
reply
The humanities in university are a breeding ground for all of the woke nonsense, and I believe there is an intentional design behind it.
I had a political science class in which the teacher was talking about one of these woke concepts, which was 'neo colonialism ' or 'post colonialism' or something like that. The basic idea was that the colonial mentality that was prevalent in the 18th-19th century was still ongoing to this day through art and some media. The teacher showed us a video explaining this concept, and that's how I saw the clear intent to deceive. In the video, a clip from the second Indiana Jones film was taken out of context to supposedly support the idea of colonialist thought still existing in recent movies. The scene in the movie shows indie and the woman ( forgot her name) reacting in horror to the Indian cult leader pulling a heart out of some guy. Of course, anybody who has seen the film understands that they were simply reacting to the horror of the cult's practices, but they tried to frame it as white people being horrified by backward Indian barbarians.
They probably assume that zoomers nowadays barely know anything about Indiana Jones, and assumed that the clip was a genuine argument.
The teacher also gave an example about rambo movies in which we see the main character; a white man, mowing down Vietnamese people effortlessly. That time I actually mentioned to the teacher that the first film set him against the national guard in the US, to which she had no answer to. It felt great to have an opportunity to counter such lies.
reply
milannagy2007
Hi! I’m a hungarian viewer of yours!
I think I get your general claim about liberal marxism (although that’s not the term u use) I’m curious what do you think about the authoratic nature of the alt right.
I generally agree with your points about the damage that has been done by leaving religion and your text wall of things that the society things are truth but what I see and I experience in Hungary is that the national elites are utterly cynical and burocratic with their claimed values while they undermine the democratic institutions.
What i’m seeing trough the democrat media I consume, that it’s a similar case in the US expect the HUGE historical differences that comes with the country.
So my question would be: do you expect democracy to survive
I mean the means of the state: people can decide about their leaders.
What do you think, what is an ideal idea for a democracy if not social democracy
If you think democracy can’t survive this and you think good and evil exist, I would be curious about your moral stance on the upcoming change.
Since the purpose of social democracy is to maintain or expand social mobility I don’t really understand your claim about it not being the ideal state form, of course it’s possible that I misunderstood you.
Thank you for reading my comment, I appreciate if you take your time to answer it!
reply
Hi! I’m a hungarian viewer of yours!
I think I get your general claim about liberal marxism (although that’s not the term u use) I’m curious what do you think about the authoratic nature of the alt right.
I generally agree with your points about the damage that has been done by leaving religion and your text wall of things that the society things are truth but what I see and I experience in Hungary is that the national elites are utterly cynical and burocratic with their claimed values while they undermine the democratic institutions.
What i’m seeing trough the democrat media I consume, that it’s a similar case in the US expect the HUGE historical differences that comes with the country.
So my question would be: do you expect democracy to survive
I mean the means of the state: people can decide about their leaders.
What do you think, what is an ideal idea for a democracy if not social democracy
If you think democracy can’t survive this and you think good and evil exist, I would be curious about your moral stance on the upcoming change.
Since the purpose of social democracy is to maintain or expand social mobility I don’t really understand your claim about it not being the ideal state form, of course it’s possible that I misunderstood you.
Thank you for reading my comment, I appreciate if you take your time to answer it!
reply
alexander-loewe
Interesting video, but I think the use of the term liberal is a bit off here. Historically, liberalism doesn’t primarily mean egalitarianism. In its classical sense which is still widely agreed upon liberalism stands for a political order that maximises individual autonomy and limits state power. That’s quite different from what the French Revolution promoted.
What the French revolutionaries really aimed for was egalitarianism the abolition of social classes and a society without hierarchical structures. That’s also the core of Marx and Engels’ thinking, always framed around class struggle. Egalitarianism says it shouldn’t matter which class you’re from, because classes should no longer exist.
In contrast, liberalism is rooted in individual rights, not class identity. Ironically, the modern use of liberal especially in Anglo-American contexts has been conflated with left-leaning ideas that often resemble egalitarian or even collectivist thought. Many who call themselves liberal today actually promote policies that undermine individual autonomy and reintroduce a dominant ruling class only this time not kings or nobles, but the modern state apparatus itself.
reply
Interesting video, but I think the use of the term liberal is a bit off here. Historically, liberalism doesn’t primarily mean egalitarianism. In its classical sense which is still widely agreed upon liberalism stands for a political order that maximises individual autonomy and limits state power. That’s quite different from what the French Revolution promoted.
What the French revolutionaries really aimed for was egalitarianism the abolition of social classes and a society without hierarchical structures. That’s also the core of Marx and Engels’ thinking, always framed around class struggle. Egalitarianism says it shouldn’t matter which class you’re from, because classes should no longer exist.
In contrast, liberalism is rooted in individual rights, not class identity. Ironically, the modern use of liberal especially in Anglo-American contexts has been conflated with left-leaning ideas that often resemble egalitarian or even collectivist thought. Many who call themselves liberal today actually promote policies that undermine individual autonomy and reintroduce a dominant ruling class only this time not kings or nobles, but the modern state apparatus itself.
reply
LeeroyDrinkins
The point of Marxism winning the spiritual battle is not only true but I think goes even deeper, socialist and Marxist beliefs never fell out of favor or popularity among intellectuals and academics, which were widely popular during the 20's and 30's right after the first red scare, they rose to dominance during FDR and beyond due to his effectively restructuring of the federal government to rule by committee of the college educated class. even during McCarthyism and the second red scare academia was never seriously put under scrutiny to my knowledge and by the 60's and 70's socialist ideas were already being taught even if not under the banner of it, just under the banner of intellectualism and the propagation of the FDR style of governance with it continuing until now after generations the same ideas are taught but now openly as socialism, Marxism etc. depending on which college professor etc. The ego of the academic or perhaps nativity that as academics they could and should lead and govern all aspects of life just causes these ideologies to be attractive to them
reply
The point of Marxism winning the spiritual battle is not only true but I think goes even deeper, socialist and Marxist beliefs never fell out of favor or popularity among intellectuals and academics, which were widely popular during the 20's and 30's right after the first red scare, they rose to dominance during FDR and beyond due to his effectively restructuring of the federal government to rule by committee of the college educated class. even during McCarthyism and the second red scare academia was never seriously put under scrutiny to my knowledge and by the 60's and 70's socialist ideas were already being taught even if not under the banner of it, just under the banner of intellectualism and the propagation of the FDR style of governance with it continuing until now after generations the same ideas are taught but now openly as socialism, Marxism etc. depending on which college professor etc. The ego of the academic or perhaps nativity that as academics they could and should lead and govern all aspects of life just causes these ideologies to be attractive to them
reply
markomicunovic5896
Passed through all three phases mentioned. With a lot of self improvement managed to improve my life, finally get a good job, etc. Stopped caring about anyones opinion, especially the society expectations, and generally stopped caring about people that are not really a part of my life, women or dating completely. Then I realised I suddenly became attractive to many of them. It just gives you so much freedom to just be yourself without needing validation from absolutely anyone. And it seems that's very attractive to women. Then I have accidentally met a girl who genuinely loves me. I love her too. I still don't give a shit about what any single person on this globe thinks of me except for the members of the immediate family. I have some goals, but if none of that works out and I stay with this girl and have a family I will still consider myself happy. Just learn to be good with yourself and enjoy being alone. Don't be with anyone for the sake of just not being alone. Embrace the loneliness and it might produce something amazing.
reply
Passed through all three phases mentioned. With a lot of self improvement managed to improve my life, finally get a good job, etc. Stopped caring about anyones opinion, especially the society expectations, and generally stopped caring about people that are not really a part of my life, women or dating completely. Then I realised I suddenly became attractive to many of them. It just gives you so much freedom to just be yourself without needing validation from absolutely anyone. And it seems that's very attractive to women. Then I have accidentally met a girl who genuinely loves me. I love her too. I still don't give a shit about what any single person on this globe thinks of me except for the members of the immediate family. I have some goals, but if none of that works out and I stay with this girl and have a family I will still consider myself happy. Just learn to be good with yourself and enjoy being alone. Don't be with anyone for the sake of just not being alone. Embrace the loneliness and it might produce something amazing.
reply
jimbeckert7946
I'm a Gen X kid. I grew up thinking the society we have is normal. I thought it was normal for each successive generation having more and more wealth. Maybe that could have been maintained slightly longer if we didn't open our country and markets to foreigners and foreign-made products made by slaves overseas. The growth of materialism certainly would not have been as great as it has been over the last 30-40 years, but our society would be more stable, sensible, and equitable.
The reality is, the society we have now is a bubble created at the end of WWII. Then it was undermined for profits. We were propagandized to hate God. We thought we are so rich we can afford to house, feed, and give free healthcare to people who refuse to work. Of course, that can be maintained as long as the money is printed and nobody has to pay off that debt. Of course, that's coming to an end. It's already become mathematically impossible to pay the debt and we now spend more money on interest than on our military.
reply
I'm a Gen X kid. I grew up thinking the society we have is normal. I thought it was normal for each successive generation having more and more wealth. Maybe that could have been maintained slightly longer if we didn't open our country and markets to foreigners and foreign-made products made by slaves overseas. The growth of materialism certainly would not have been as great as it has been over the last 30-40 years, but our society would be more stable, sensible, and equitable.
The reality is, the society we have now is a bubble created at the end of WWII. Then it was undermined for profits. We were propagandized to hate God. We thought we are so rich we can afford to house, feed, and give free healthcare to people who refuse to work. Of course, that can be maintained as long as the money is printed and nobody has to pay off that debt. Of course, that's coming to an end. It's already become mathematically impossible to pay the debt and we now spend more money on interest than on our military.
reply
brezals
I remember my first red pill moment of 2014. gamergate, stefan molyneux. It truly was the moment I went, HANG ON A SECOND WHATS ACTUALLY GOING ON HERE and I saw the reality as it was. I am glad I never got indoctrinated into leftist views first tho. I was someone who was blissfully ignorant of everything going on before 2014. to the point that I remember distinctively that year 2014, the first year I could vote, I asked some stranger online if this particular political party I should vote for and he basicly said they were communist. I knew that term from history, from games and other media as a thing of the past. not something that existed today or was even relevant, that was me 21 years old and I swalled the red pill and went throught a journey of self discovery and self improvement, after realising I was heading to a very parisitic way of life.
reply
I remember my first red pill moment of 2014. gamergate, stefan molyneux. It truly was the moment I went, HANG ON A SECOND WHATS ACTUALLY GOING ON HERE and I saw the reality as it was. I am glad I never got indoctrinated into leftist views first tho. I was someone who was blissfully ignorant of everything going on before 2014. to the point that I remember distinctively that year 2014, the first year I could vote, I asked some stranger online if this particular political party I should vote for and he basicly said they were communist. I knew that term from history, from games and other media as a thing of the past. not something that existed today or was even relevant, that was me 21 years old and I swalled the red pill and went throught a journey of self discovery and self improvement, after realising I was heading to a very parisitic way of life.
reply
keymaker2112
I actually think the notion that everything has been subsumed by politics is the opposite of what has happened. See, we actually have NO real political outlets anymore, lacking any solidarity, organizational mechanism, meaningful chance at effecting change, etc. This absence has actually driven us insane as we mono manically pursue the political release we cannot have, and in so doing we become obsessed and starting TREATING everything else as a proxy for politics.
So. maybe I don't disagree, but the mechanism of action is an inversion of what one would presume.
But actual politics is dead. It doesn't exist for 99. 999999% of people, and we want it to, desperately.
reply
I actually think the notion that everything has been subsumed by politics is the opposite of what has happened. See, we actually have NO real political outlets anymore, lacking any solidarity, organizational mechanism, meaningful chance at effecting change, etc. This absence has actually driven us insane as we mono manically pursue the political release we cannot have, and in so doing we become obsessed and starting TREATING everything else as a proxy for politics.
So. maybe I don't disagree, but the mechanism of action is an inversion of what one would presume.
But actual politics is dead. It doesn't exist for 99. 999999% of people, and we want it to, desperately.
reply
msierox
I’m a female, I was born in the 90s so I didn’t grow up with some of this new me too propaganda but I remember teachers always saying girls can do anything boys can do. I always thought that was the dumbest thing I ever heard. For starters I couldn’t stand up when I pee. Also I knew boys were much stronger.
I don’t ever remember being red pilled or being under some sort of illusion. There is one instance I can remember that maybe qualifies - I figured out the people in & who run the government are a bunch of idiots who are incompetent & the probability of them pulling off half the conspiracies people think are true is low.
reply
I’m a female, I was born in the 90s so I didn’t grow up with some of this new me too propaganda but I remember teachers always saying girls can do anything boys can do. I always thought that was the dumbest thing I ever heard. For starters I couldn’t stand up when I pee. Also I knew boys were much stronger.
I don’t ever remember being red pilled or being under some sort of illusion. There is one instance I can remember that maybe qualifies - I figured out the people in & who run the government are a bunch of idiots who are incompetent & the probability of them pulling off half the conspiracies people think are true is low.
reply
zerx9926
Nothing probably would change fundamentally. Someone else would come. A person or a corporate or political entity. And capitalize on the distrust towards existing systems of beliefs by creating something new. It always is like that, and only the interests of those who stand behind it, or end up on top are pusrsued. And you can just accept what you are fed believing it is happiness. Or trying to achieve your happiness by going ego. And since systems do provide some good things for individuals, I think the best way is use it and be used by it. To get what you want and try to achieve what you personally want.
reply
Nothing probably would change fundamentally. Someone else would come. A person or a corporate or political entity. And capitalize on the distrust towards existing systems of beliefs by creating something new. It always is like that, and only the interests of those who stand behind it, or end up on top are pusrsued. And you can just accept what you are fed believing it is happiness. Or trying to achieve your happiness by going ego. And since systems do provide some good things for individuals, I think the best way is use it and be used by it. To get what you want and try to achieve what you personally want.
reply
Lord_Reavous
Dude, born in 1982 and I feel like I was born in the wrong century too.
I feel awful for anyone having to trudge through this mess. This has also affected me and I opted for religion and just focusing on my own health. I am not married either and can empathize though I admit that I don't fully understand what young men are going through.
Eventually the weight of this will collapse, I just hope it is a brighter time. My concern is that the right is really weak willed politically in our system. You need stronger more willing to take risks in the political arena.
reply
Dude, born in 1982 and I feel like I was born in the wrong century too.
I feel awful for anyone having to trudge through this mess. This has also affected me and I opted for religion and just focusing on my own health. I am not married either and can empathize though I admit that I don't fully understand what young men are going through.
Eventually the weight of this will collapse, I just hope it is a brighter time. My concern is that the right is really weak willed politically in our system. You need stronger more willing to take risks in the political arena.
reply
scottw5315
Better figure out what the small hats are doing to us. Guys like Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Larry Fink, Michael Bloomberg, Bob Iger, Mark Zucke3rberg. they were behind the stolen erection of 2020, the plandemic, the killer vack scene, as well as mass immigration, anti-white bias, anti-male bias, anti-christian bias, LGBTQ plus peedo. It's clear that all small hats aren't bent on destruction of western civilization but it sure seems like those bent on destroying us wear small hats.
reply
Better figure out what the small hats are doing to us. Guys like Klaus Schwab, George Soros, Larry Fink, Michael Bloomberg, Bob Iger, Mark Zucke3rberg. they were behind the stolen erection of 2020, the plandemic, the killer vack scene, as well as mass immigration, anti-white bias, anti-male bias, anti-christian bias, LGBTQ plus peedo. It's clear that all small hats aren't bent on destruction of western civilization but it sure seems like those bent on destroying us wear small hats.
reply
maplesyrup1805
I’ll answer your question-how did men go from being in charge to being walked all over The gynocracy took over. The bureaucracy gives the gynocracy whatever it wants because it benefits the bureaucracy that’s already in power and keeps them in power. The gynocracy is a psychological mashup of idealogies. Hating and being jealous of white men in power is one of them. And who is a good scapegoat young white men. All the while those in power stay in power. The boomers.
reply
I’ll answer your question-how did men go from being in charge to being walked all over The gynocracy took over. The bureaucracy gives the gynocracy whatever it wants because it benefits the bureaucracy that’s already in power and keeps them in power. The gynocracy is a psychological mashup of idealogies. Hating and being jealous of white men in power is one of them. And who is a good scapegoat young white men. All the while those in power stay in power. The boomers.
reply
maplesyrup1805
I’ll answer your question-how did men go from being in charge to being walked all over The gynocracy took over. The bureaucracy gives the gynocracy whatever it wants because it benefits the bureaucracy that’s already in power and keeps them in power. The gynocracy is a psychological mashup of idealogies. Hating and being jealous of white men in power is one of them. And who is a good scapegoat young white men. All the while those in power stay in power. The boomers.
reply
I’ll answer your question-how did men go from being in charge to being walked all over The gynocracy took over. The bureaucracy gives the gynocracy whatever it wants because it benefits the bureaucracy that’s already in power and keeps them in power. The gynocracy is a psychological mashup of idealogies. Hating and being jealous of white men in power is one of them. And who is a good scapegoat young white men. All the while those in power stay in power. The boomers.
reply
chza1181
This was a great video other than your views on Nihilism, meaninglessness doesn't have to always lead to pointless misery, it can also lead to great motivation and dampen your fears of failure when trying new things. I realise some people just can't live without purpose and i'm not saying that to be patronising, but to say that everyone is motivated by different things and I know it's not for everyone, because it can definitely lead people down a dark road.
reply
This was a great video other than your views on Nihilism, meaninglessness doesn't have to always lead to pointless misery, it can also lead to great motivation and dampen your fears of failure when trying new things. I realise some people just can't live without purpose and i'm not saying that to be patronising, but to say that everyone is motivated by different things and I know it's not for everyone, because it can definitely lead people down a dark road.
reply
marekwrona9298
Error found -> Soviet Union don't collapse by it own. Countries in west have huge interest to do it and they help collapse by various ways like spreading Propaganda to social engineering uprising against parties in those countries. Reason's can be cheap labor, mineral resources expand exports sales of products, destroy competition. For example in Poland before 1989 was higher export that import, less debt much more manufacture's that now.
reply
Error found -> Soviet Union don't collapse by it own. Countries in west have huge interest to do it and they help collapse by various ways like spreading Propaganda to social engineering uprising against parties in those countries. Reason's can be cheap labor, mineral resources expand exports sales of products, destroy competition. For example in Poland before 1989 was higher export that import, less debt much more manufacture's that now.
reply
GhostofSigmasPast
The real flaw in the modern blue pill is it is more focused on fighting the system then helping the individuals. for example i knew a trans kid back in 8th grade, but the thing is i dont think he was actually trans. All of his friends were girls that he meet before his transition, and his personality was more feminine than masculine(60: 40 ratio. I believe he would of just have become a punk(y) girl if not pushed into becoming trans.
reply
The real flaw in the modern blue pill is it is more focused on fighting the system then helping the individuals. for example i knew a trans kid back in 8th grade, but the thing is i dont think he was actually trans. All of his friends were girls that he meet before his transition, and his personality was more feminine than masculine(60: 40 ratio. I believe he would of just have become a punk(y) girl if not pushed into becoming trans.
reply
PCJustice70
I know you’ll probably not read this, but thank you. I was born early ’70s, through a combination of misfortunes managed to get exposed to current-day early. No one would listen or understand. Even worse, I thought it was a leftover of the ’60s. It’s been really bad since the late ’80s. I couldn’t figure out what I was doing wrong. Look at the disaffected Generation X there’s a lot more of us than you would think.
reply
I know you’ll probably not read this, but thank you. I was born early ’70s, through a combination of misfortunes managed to get exposed to current-day early. No one would listen or understand. Even worse, I thought it was a leftover of the ’60s. It’s been really bad since the late ’80s. I couldn’t figure out what I was doing wrong. Look at the disaffected Generation X there’s a lot more of us than you would think.
reply
TheJoshJman
I’m of Hispanic descent. Born in America. Parents came here legally. My mother tells that my great grandfather and kin colonized the Northeastern region of Guatemala circa late 1800’s. They built bridges and roads, helped the locals with military training and weapons. I’ve always been fascinated by that feat and now that I understand the nuance I’m proud of it and I’m not ashamed of it.
reply
I’m of Hispanic descent. Born in America. Parents came here legally. My mother tells that my great grandfather and kin colonized the Northeastern region of Guatemala circa late 1800’s. They built bridges and roads, helped the locals with military training and weapons. I’ve always been fascinated by that feat and now that I understand the nuance I’m proud of it and I’m not ashamed of it.
reply
Jackaroo.
I'm a millennial that turned 18 in 2008, when the entire world economy collapsed around me. What you are saying is very true and will require courage and strength to break the hold of this false reality thrust upon the western world. You are correct that this arose from the world wars, but it began in 1913. It is not a coincidence WW1 began right after the establishment of the Federal Reserve.
reply
I'm a millennial that turned 18 in 2008, when the entire world economy collapsed around me. What you are saying is very true and will require courage and strength to break the hold of this false reality thrust upon the western world. You are correct that this arose from the world wars, but it began in 1913. It is not a coincidence WW1 began right after the establishment of the Federal Reserve.
reply
Add a review, comment
Other channel videos
