VehiclesFashionRecipesBlogsHuntTravelsSportFunHandmadeITEducation
Mini-Games
x

x
zakruti.com » Knowledge, science, education » Crash Course
The Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41

The Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41

FBTwitterReddit

video description

Rating: 4.0; Vote: 1
The Rise of Conservatism: Crash Course US History #41 education: This is pretty opinion based and requires a lot of mind reading. Conservatives have more than enough reason at that time to be cautious at the overreach and expansion of power of the government. You implied reasoning is often racism, and when a racist left the Dems for the Republicans, you makevit sound like it was because he was racist and the Republicans were also racist, but that logic doesn't follow. First, he was a Democrat, and racist, so by your previous logic, Democrats are racist, and a few racist from the Democrats switched sides. You can be a racist and believe in the principles of both parties, clearly. The government was expanding at an astronomical rate and anyone who was worried about huge government would have had the Cold War and Kennedys assassination to look to. There is a lot of mind reading and to take political rhetoric seriously as an expression of belief and thought is a childish notion at best and purposefully misleading. You failed to mention a lot of the horrible things the Democrats said after contructing the Great Society. We all know what quote Im talking about and that wasnt a political statement, that was just candid talk. Informative, but a little biased.
Date: 2022-04-04

Comments and reviews: 9


Compared to most summaries of conservatism given by a liberal, this one was at least closer to fair than usual. Not completely mind you, especially with the not so subtle digs against our concerns on how welfare is run and furthering the vastly incorrect stereotype that race was a core factor outside the deep south. Conservatism, especially modern conservatism, is best summed up as believing people should be in control of their own lives and that average citizens could run things more efficiently than the government does. People tend to be more conservative than they think on one issue or another (and many professed conservatives hold some liberal ideologies too)
reply

I wouldn't really consider Nixon representative of the conservative movement. He claimed to believe in Keynesian economics, and many of his policies were indistinguishable from the liberals of his time; he even proposed universal basic income. Ronald Reagan, I would argue, was the true poster boy of conservatism. He slashed taxes, expressed fear of an overreaching government, and propped up family values. Also, I don't think it's fair to conflate Nixon being tough on crime to being opposed to the civil rights movement.
reply

A lot of the -big government- programs Nixon started were common sense programs. For example, the EPA started with the purpose of telling companies to not dump literal waste into water. Obviously now the EPA has been labeled as far left by conservatives with -radical ideas- such as clean energy and fuel efficient cars.
reply

Yikes. No mention of William F Buckley or National Review or Russell Kirk or Friedrich Hayek or Milton Friedman or Ludwig von Mises, Bill Cristol, William Safire, George Santayana, Robert Nisbet, Richard Neuhaus, tNRA, tSouthern Baptist Convention, tUSCCB, Neo-Conservativism.
reply

This is not entirely correct about Goldwater. Goldwater was a true conservative who stood by his principles in believing in federalism. He believed in state-s rights and that it-s up the people in their own state to decide. But it did cost him the election.
reply

Sad that you can't leave your political views/thoughts out of teaching. maybe you could actually teach something that wasn't contaminated. you know! The POUR TRUTH! Just a shame since you actually have an ounce of talent. JUST SAYING.
reply

conservatism: resurfaced in the 1870s in late reconstruction, 1920s, 1970's (topic of this video, late 2010's. hey, every 40-50 years, conservatism comes back to interrupt the gradual progressive direction of the country.
reply

Uhhh. So now Republicans are anti-civil rights?
Have you heard of a democrat called Strom Thurmond?
You know, the one who talked for 36 hours to try and defeat the Civil Rights Act that the Republicans championed?

reply

I don't agree Nixon was pro-segregation. Given that democrats had 100 years later adopt civil rights republicans focused in economy. But this don't make republicans racist or pro-segregation.
reply
Add a review, comment






Other channel videos